Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 3:07:15 GMT -5
The system of moral compromise has certain characteristics. Let's take the hunter-gatherer dilemma as an example. The system generates all kinds of judgments: from aggressive to compromised. Hunter-gatherers fish all day long. The gains were minimal: it was not enough to feed the children and sick brother. At this time, the neighbors were smoking fish. Collectors asked to share. They give him fish, but much less than he asks for. Yes, stealing is wrong. But neither was ignoring the fact that his brother was ill. What decision can he make.
Don't steal anything, part or all of the fish. The Moral Compromise System UK Mobile Number List offers all of these options. Judgment depends on incentives. Incentives determine which solutions are available to us and what we can do. Our collectors consider how each stolen fish will speed up the brother's recovery and how much it will hurt his neighbors. For example, he might decide that he can steal all the neighbor's fish if it saves his brother's life. If the younger brother has a cold and just a day of extra food will bring him one step closer to recovery, he's likely to be discouraged from stealing.
If the fish significantly helps the brother fight off disease while not doing too much harm to the neighbors, collectors would rather just steal part of the fish. responsible for specific values (honor, justice, mutual aid, etc.). The value, in turn, suggests a solution. Reciprocity is related to cognitive systems of social exchange. Suppose a forager remembers that he was helpful to his neighbor last week, and her response is to be mean. The cognitive system might suggest that he is entitled to more fish than he gets. Another set of rules altruism says it is necessary to take care of relatives even if they don't reciprocate.
Don't steal anything, part or all of the fish. The Moral Compromise System UK Mobile Number List offers all of these options. Judgment depends on incentives. Incentives determine which solutions are available to us and what we can do. Our collectors consider how each stolen fish will speed up the brother's recovery and how much it will hurt his neighbors. For example, he might decide that he can steal all the neighbor's fish if it saves his brother's life. If the younger brother has a cold and just a day of extra food will bring him one step closer to recovery, he's likely to be discouraged from stealing.
If the fish significantly helps the brother fight off disease while not doing too much harm to the neighbors, collectors would rather just steal part of the fish. responsible for specific values (honor, justice, mutual aid, etc.). The value, in turn, suggests a solution. Reciprocity is related to cognitive systems of social exchange. Suppose a forager remembers that he was helpful to his neighbor last week, and her response is to be mean. The cognitive system might suggest that he is entitled to more fish than he gets. Another set of rules altruism says it is necessary to take care of relatives even if they don't reciprocate.